Rules question about fortified BUA -l posted by Vince Cholewa, 30 june 2019

A few questions about fortified built up areas. First, a BUA more than 800p across must have PF. BUAf is defined as “BUA if optionally allowed PF.” Does that mean a BUA more than 800p across must be BUAf? If so, is 800p the maximum size for a BUA in lists that do not include BUAf? 
Secondly, if an army most does not include fortifications, can a BUA have TF or PF? That is, do the descriptions of fortified BUA (p.11) allow fortifications additional to those in army lists? 
Your opinions most welcome.
https://www.facebook.com/groups/824840264342234/permalink/1231153247044265/

Chu Kwok Wah When the BUA is more than 800p should be fortified. If the army list not included BUAf, just can choose smaller size.

3

• Like
•  · Reply
•  · 1d

• 

  Che Tibby this is my reading too. if it's bigger than 800p it *must* have fortifications. if the BUA is smaller than 800p it can have TF, but cannot have PF unless specified by the list - BUAf.

  4

  • Like
  •  · Reply
  •  · 1d

• 

  Kenneth Chan Please note the dimension of the BUA that requires PF is specified as ACROSS. 
  
  If no BUAf is stipulated but only BUA in the list then you cannot have a BUA exceed 800p across.

  5

  • Like
  •  · Reply
  •  · 1d
  •  · Edited
• Active Now

  Neil Williamson I agree with the above.
  Plus if you look at page 64 (or pg 2 in an army book) it clarifies things more. Any BUA can have TF (if it is a defender). PF can only be part of a BUAf. And any large BUA must have PF (from pg 11)

  2

  • Like
  •  · Reply
  •  · 1d