There were five games of DBMM at the Hutt Valley Wargaming Club yesterday and also several World War 2, several modern, one Napoleonic and one that looked lots of fun and included vampires on a big sailing ship.
Here are pics from the DBMM games. My apologies to
Neil Williamson (Huns) and Wayne Watts (Thessalian Greeks), I didn’t get any pics of your game
Craig Mabon (Sung Chinese) and
Ross Mabon (Delhi Sultanate - Moslem Indians) played an interesting homegrown variation
of the rules allowing for the armies to have different points. Neil Williamson developed them, using a sliding scale of victory points based on the number of bounds played. A most interesting game.
I will post a report of my game later today. That was a good win to Alastair Duncan using Golden Horde Tatars vs my medieval Polish.
https://www.facebook.com/groups/824840264342234/posts/2147442795415301/
|
Alastair Duncan (Golden Horde Tatars) having his first bound. I (medieval Polish) had already had the first bound of the game. |
|
Peter Noble (Goths) vs Michail Woolf (Early Imperial Roman) |
|
Allen Yaxley (Norse Irish) vs Doug Smith (Wars of the Roses English) |
|
Delhi Sultanate cavalry |
|
Closer view of Delhi Sultanate cavalry |
|
Delhi Sultanate horse archers |
|
Delhi Sultanate archers and rocketeers |
Andrew BennettsI would be keen to learn more about Neil's ideas for games between armies of differing points.
Vincent Cholewa+1
Neil Williamson a literally correct answer but possibly not entirely helpful!
I will rephrase my question: would you please post the scoring amendments for unequal games?
Neil WilliamsonVincent Cholewa In brief, the onus us on the 450 ap army to win as quickly as possible against the 300ap army.
A win in turns 1 to 5 gives 25VP less penalty points. This then drops by 4VP every turn.
There are some other minor modifications to restrict
"gaming" and some quick win rules for the smaller army.
The system may be tweaked yet
No comments:
Post a Comment