Any changes likely to DBMM 2.1? Asked by John Moher, 8 August 2022

Hi all - what's the state of DBMM version 2.1 - is this expected to be the current edition for a while still, or given its about 6 years old (if I am correct) is there likely to be an updated edition in near future? Likewise the army list books too? And what's the difference between the 2016 and what appears to be a 2019 edition (is it just the Lulu print on demand thing)? Appreciate any enlightenment - been away from DBMM since about 2014 so lost touch with the edition history, etc. 

https://www.facebook.com/groups/824840264342234/posts/2132681696891411/

• • • John Gildea

      I’m doubtful there would be any update to this version. I think as Phil is now quite elderly I have the impression he is not planning any more rules versions. There are some detailed commentary and interpretive docs around. I think it’s great as it is though

      

      3

      • Like
      • Reply
      • Share
      • 6d
      • John Moher

        Author

        Thanks John - that's what I was suspecting... Is the errata for the rulebook and army lists and the commentary/interpretation documents collated somewhere?

        • Like
        • Reply
        • Share
        • 6d
    • John Moher

      Author

      Also was there much change to army lists from the original 2007-2009 edition ones?

      • Like
      • Reply
      • Share
      • 6d
      • Neil Williamson

        John Moher I have not found many alterations. I have the old books 1 and 3. When I want to build an army I just get someone to send a photo or I check with an up to date book at the club.

        

        • Like
        • Reply
        • Share
        • 6d
        • John Moher

          Author

          Neil thanks.

          • Like
          • Reply
          • Share
          • 6d
    • John Gildea

      I think the commentary and errata are in DBMM group files?From memory some lists had a few changes from the first editions. Likely other people on this group will know more

      

      2

      • Like
      • Reply
      • Share
      • 6d
    • John Gildea

      If I can find links to the docs I’ll post the here

      

      • Like
      • Reply
      • Share
      • 6d
    • John Edmundson

      There were a couple of lists that seemed to introduce Bw(x)/Bw(i) DBEs. They were fixed - now Bw(x)/Bw(o) I believe. Not much else.

      

      • Like
      • Reply
      • Share
      • 6d
      • Andreas von Dbx

        John Edmundson and the Jurchen-Chin RegBdX @ 9AP should be "BdS @9AP"

        

        2

        • Like
        • Reply
        • Share
        • 6d
      • John Moher

        Author

        John & Andreas thanks.

        • Like
        • Reply
        • Share
        • 6d
    • Active

      Vincent Cholewa

      Admin

      Group expert

      The commentary is in the files section of this FB group. It is a series of clarifications and explanations, not an errata. It does not change the rules 

      

      • Like
      • Reply
      • Share
      • 6d
      • John Moher

        Author

        Vincent thanks!

        

        • Like