Monday 22 April 2024

Update: DBMM Nationals, King's Birthday Weekend, Saturday 1st and Sunday 2nd June - posted by Andrew Benetts, 23 April 2024

https://www.facebook.com/groups/824840264342234/user/740863807

DBMM Nationals Update - Where are the Medieval players?
This years trophies have arrived (thanks Potbelly Miniatures) and are now primed and will be off to be mounted tomorrow.
There are a reasonable number of registrations to date but the overwhelming majority are for the Pre 1071 Pool. So come on you Medieval Players, where are you?
I will be at Valleycon this weekend so, if you are keen to come to the Nationals at Kings Birthday, please shoulder tap me and I can take down your registration details.
Format is the same as last year with date based Pools:
  • Armies before 1071AD - Default 400AP or 450AP by mutual agreement
  • Armies from 1071AD - Default 450AP or 400AP by mutual agreement
The reduced cost for Bge(O) will be repeated this year, to encourage players to use this more historically appropriate option.
In addition, instead of players needing to specify Stratagems in their lists, a new option will be to allow simply reserving a value of AP in your army list and being allowed to select up to two stratagems up to this value on a game by game basis.

Full details are in the Player Pack that I have loaded into the Files section https://www.facebook.com/.../permalink/2520187241474186/ 




Can you help with Late Imperial Roman list? Asked by Chris Blacker, 23 April 2024

Hi all, Levin wargamer, Chris Blackler, has bought this Late Imperial Roman army for DBA and would like to expand it to a DBMM army. Would people who have used the army or know the list well be able to help with suggestions for command structure, tactics etc.? 

https://www.facebook.com/groups/824840264342234/posts/2574344636058446/













AI sculpting? Posted by Ryan Dan, 23 April 2024


https://www.facebook.com/groups/824840264342234/posts/2574271686065741
 Vincent Cholewa

Admin
Group expert
+1
Hi Ryan many thanks for posting. Would you like to edit the post, adding a description of what these are?
  • Like
  • Reply
  • Share
Ben Vartok
Top Contributor
Is this the future, AI sculpting?




Two DBMM games at the Wellington Warlords on Saturday - from Alastair Duncan, 22 April 2024

At the Wellington Warlords on Saturday, from Roving Reporter, Alastair Duncan: Michael Stonyer and Dr Reg skipped the DBMM bug but still managed to look ancient with a 15 mm DBA dark ages bash offering a path to bigger things.
Meanwhile, Daniel Wade’s Ancient Brits managed to overwhelm Barry Norris’s later Carthaginians - though it would have been a faster game if the respective warbands had remembered to kill their opponents in two ranks!

Somewhere in India, Richard Fields’ Classical Indians worked out that Bw(I) and elephants could easily see off Alastair Duncan’s Alan's!!!! 

https://www.facebook.com/groups/824840264342234/posts/2573097636183146/

Barry Norris (Later Carthaginian) vs Daniel Wade (Ancient British)

Not sure what this game was. Can anyone help?

Michael Stonyer and Reg Newall played a 15mm DBA bash

Barry Norris (Later Carthaginian) vs Daniel Wade (Ancient British)

Alastair Duncan (Alans) vs Richard Fields (Classical Indians)


John van den Hoeven
Top Contributor
Reg and Mike's game was 28mm and another system. To the Strongest?
  • Like
  • Reply
  • Share
2
Vincent Cholewa
Author
Admin
+2
John van den Hoeven that explains the round bases, many thanks. Did they play 15mm DBA, too?
  • Like
  • Reply
  • Share
John van den Hoeven
Top Contributor
Don't think so, Reg doesn't like DBX systems.I only know this since I was playing my first game of anything this year at Battlegroup WW2
  • Like
  • Reply
  • Share
  • Edited
Daniel Wade
Top Contributor
I was hesitant to report my game with Barry as he has given me lots of help and advice with my list. I repaid his kindness by beating him.
  • Wow
  • Reply
  • Share
Alastair Duncan
Top Contributor
Correction. Stonyer and the good Doctor were 28mm Lion Rampant medieval while the 15mm were not them.
This correction circulated in the interests of protecting ting reputations and mainstream dbmm journalism!!!!
  • Like
  • Reply
  • Share
2